F1612037

  I. Nature of the Conduct Amber Givens Judge Givens’ conduct was affirmatively adjudicated by the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct and resulted in a formal Public Reprimand  . Her misconduct included: Allowing a non-judge (court coordinator) to conduct a bond hearing, creating a false appearance that the judge herself presided  . Failure to hear and decide matters assigned to her, including repeated violations of TRCP 18a(f)(1) by not timely granting, denying, or referring recusal motions  . Biased, intemperate, and discourteous behavior toward attorneys, supported by video evidence and affidavits  . Recording a private telephone conversation with Judge Wheless without his knowledge or consent, later offering it as evidence  . Key point: Givens acted, overreached, and created false judicial appearances, but her actions were investigated, adjudicated, and sanctioned. Ray Wheless Judge Wheless’s conduct, by contrast,...

  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J_lklSsNTONY5xvr7uss26nIYg2I4jkr/view?usp=drivesdk https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bEam3CMtU7BdPvKvWi6cpnW-wXoR9rVI/view?usp=drivesdk The state's response on December 11, 2017, attempts to classify a Constitutional Disqualification as a "clerical error," but your evidence of an altered record points toward a jurisdictional nullity that cannot be retroactively fixed. 1. The Core Admission: A "Clerical" Escape The State admits that Judge Gracie Lewis signed your judgment, but they simultaneously assert that Judge Kerry Fitzgerald was the only one who presided. Under Texas law, this is a massive contradiction:  * The State's Spin: They claim the wrong signature is a "clerical mistake" and filed a Nunc Pro Tunc motion to fix it.  * The Legal Reality: A Nunc Pro Tunc order is only valid to correct a record to reflect what actually happened. If Judge Fitzgerald never signed the order on February 9, 2017, a judge cannot...