Eat a Dick Grok

-

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J_lklSsNTONY5xvr7uss26nIYg2I4jkr/view?usp=drivesdk


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bEam3CMtU7BdPvKvWi6cpnW-wXoR9rVI/view?usp=drivesdk



The state's response on December 11, 2017, attempts to classify a Constitutional Disqualification as a "clerical error," but your evidence of an altered record points toward a jurisdictional nullity that cannot be retroactively fixed.

1. The Core Admission: A "Clerical" Escape

The State admits that Judge Gracie Lewis signed your judgment, but they simultaneously assert that Judge Kerry Fitzgerald was the only one who presided. Under Texas law, this is a massive contradiction:

 * The State's Spin: They claim the wrong signature is a "clerical mistake" and filed a Nunc Pro Tunc motion to fix it.

 * The Legal Reality: A Nunc Pro Tunc order is only valid to correct a record to reflect what actually happened. If Judge Fitzgerald never signed the order on February 9, 2017, a judge cannot "retroactively" sign it months later to give it life. As you noted, a deferred adjudication order is a specific exercise of judicial discretion—if the person who signed it (Lewis) didn't hear the plea, she lacked the authority to "attest" to the warnings and evidence.

2. Disqualification vs. Recusal

The State insists on the word "Recusal," but the facts they admitted (the victim was the presiding judge of the court where the case began) trigger "Disqualification."

 * Absolute Nullity: Under Texas Constitution Art. V, § 11 and CCP Art. 30.01, a judge who is the "party injured" is disqualified. This is not a choice; it is a total lack of power.

 * Void vs. Voidable: A recusal is "voidable" (you have to object), but a Disqualification is VOID from the start. Any act taken by a disqualified judge—or even the "control" of the case by their court—is a nullity that "cannot be waived" and can be challenged in any court, at any time.

3. The Altered Record and "Fraud on the Court"

Your evidence suggests the record was altered to hide the victim's continued control of the case.

 * The 12-1-2017 Order: If this order was "placed" in the record 48 days after the State’s 12-11-2017 response, it suggests an attempt to "backfill" the record with a valid signature to override the void one.

 * Jurisdictional Bar: If the original judgment was signed by an unauthorized judge (Lewis) or controlled by a disqualified judge (the victim), the case was void at its inception. Removing records or adding "new" orders months later does not fix the initial lack of jurisdiction.

| Fact | State's Claim | The Legal Consequence if Fraudulent |

|---|---|---|

| Signature | Clerical Error (Judge Lewis) | Void: A judge who didn't hear the case can't sign the order. |

| Recusal | "Immediate" | Nullity: If the victim "sat" or "acted" (Aug/Oct), the case is dead. |

| New Order | Nunc Pro Tunc correction | Fraud: You cannot use Nunc Pro Tunc to create an order that didn't exist. |

The State's admission that the wrong judge signed the judgment, combined with the fact that the original judge was the victim, creates a "Jurisdictional Nullity." In Texas, a void judgment is "entitled to no respect whatsoever" (Ex parte Seidel).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037)

-
  Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037) I. Executive Summary: The Factual Plight of Cause No. F16-12037 A. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report provides a comprehensive, factual analysis of the procedural history of State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh , Cause No. F16-12037, based on a review of provided legal documents, including a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and various exhibits. The objective is to detail all alleged irregularities, judicial misconduct, and procedural issues as a foundational document for a critical analysis of the defendant's experience within the Texas judicial system. The report refrains from rendering legal judgment or expressing conclusions beyond the scope of the provided materials, focusing strictly on a dispassionate presentation of the documented claims. The findings suggest a series of interconnected issues that, taken collectively, may repr...
Read more

⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being §§§§ By the Illustrious §§§§ Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of The United States of America

-
  ⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being There was a time when the law carried weight simply by being lawful — when a judge’s robe symbolized restraint, fairness, and humility before the Constitution. That time feels further away with every passing year, and few figures illustrate this decline more clearly than Judge Brandon Birmingham of Dallas County. When the Bench Becomes a Throne A courtroom is supposed to be a temple of neutrality — a place where truth, not power, decides outcomes. Yet under Judge Birmingham’s stewardship, the line between the law and personal influence blurred beyond recognition. Instead of serving as a guardian of procedure, he became a participant in it — presiding over matters in which his own interests were entangled. The problem isn’t only the specific case or the rulings themselves; it’s what those acts do to the law’s reputation. Every time a judge acts where he is disqualified, the robe stops bei...
Read more

"This Bench Belongs To The People" load of Crap is a Threat To Public Safty

-
  Overheating can do more damage than most  people realize     so he pulled off spring valley rd just past Hillcrest about a minute from his uncle and aunts home to check his fluids. Babak Taherzadeh was on his way to his uncles nightclub in addison where they had hosted a birthday party for their landlord the night before.  It was before 9 am on a Tuesday morning .   While under the hood a young man approached and struck up a him that seemed peculiar.    When prompted he identified himself as “task force” implying warrant task force and detained Taherzadeh and took possession of his phone. Three more Carrollton Detectives would arrive in Dalas and the process of “ inventoring” taherzadehs vehivle and possessions began  while back at the sixth floor if the Dallas county courthouse it was a hecticc morning . another    carrolton detective would get Judge Jennifer bennett    at 10:15 am to sign watrants with the alleged vict...
Read more