Case Numbers in Chaos: How Texas’ Misnumbering Scheme Erodes Habeas Corpus
Case Numbers in Chaos: How Texas’ Misnumbering Scheme Erodes Habeas Corpus Introduction The Texas Constitution promises habeas corpus as a safeguard against unlawful detention. Yet in Dallas County, filings in State v. Babak Taherzadeh show how clerical misnumbering, docket alterations, and unauthorized judicial appearances transformed that safeguard into a moving target. The Numbers Game 2017 filings: First writ filed as WX1790064 on October 24, 2017, followed by WX1790073 a week later . 2019 filings: A habeas petition logged as W1612037A was later re-numbered by order of Judge Richard Beacom to WX1990873 — even though Judge Gracie Lewis had already recused 8-22-2019-Order-Recusal-Crim_Min_DC_W1612037A-_.pdf . E-file notifications confirm overlapping case numbers: F1612037J, WX1790064, and W1612037A all tied to the same filings . Instead of consistent tracking, filings were bounced between numbers, creating confusion over whether they were pre-conviction or ...