Posts

Showing posts from September 8, 2025

Judges Without Authority: How a Dallas Case Was Twisted by Void Orders and Conflicted Counsel

  Judges Without Authority: How a Dallas Case Was Twisted by Void Orders and Conflicted Counsel In Dallas County, case F1612037 shows how a legal process can be bent so far that it breaks. On paper, the system promises impartial judges, competent representation, and adherence to the rules of recusal. In practice, what happened was the opposite: unauthorized judicial action, erased records, and an appointment of defense counsel so conflicted it would be unthinkable in any fair courtroom. The Mystery of Judge Beacom’s Appearance The docket for January 18, 2018 records Judge Roland Beacom signing an order for a competency evaluation . But here’s the catch: Beacom wasn’t among the judges authorized to preside over Criminal District Court No. 3. His name doesn’t appear on the official rotation list, and yet he inserted himself into the case anyway. Worse still, the competency order was later scrubbed from the record. Competency is not a minor procedural step—it is the foun...

Exposé: Unmasking Racial Disparities in Dallas County Justice – The Guerrero Case and the Ethics Donation Game

Image
Exposé: Unmasking Racial Disparities in Dallas County Justice – The Guerrero Case and the Ethics Donation Game Welcome to the underbelly of Dallas County’s judicial system, where the scales of justice seem to tip unevenly depending on who’s holding the gavel—and who’s funding the campaigns. The recent  State of Texas v. Julio Guerrero  case, tucked into Criminal District Court No. 7, shines a harsh light on a troubling pattern: discretionary discrepancies in judicial ethics and recusal standards, with a racial undertone that’s hard to ignore. The Guerrero Recusal Riddle In April 2022, the state moved to recuse Judge Chika Anyiam from Guerrero’s case—ten felony charges, including murder and aggravated assault tied to a 2021 shooting spree. The motion, filed by John Creuzot’s office, cited concerns over impartiality, pointing to bond hearing conduct. Yet, the details remain vague, leaving us to wonder: was this a genuine ethical stand, or a strategic play in a high-stakes game? ...
Judges often say they have to live with the consequences of their Decisions. If they are lenient with a person who drives under the influence and that person harms other the next time how could they live with themselves . Recently a young woman was stabbed by a man who some say should have never been released back into society. It happens all the time one I am personally familiar with one court and its justices.  My belief in the justice system is gone already . My name is Babak taherzadeh and I went to jail for tweets . Tweets about a judge. I thought he was dirty and corrupt but i was wrong . its much much worse  Botham Jean. if you don't remember his name perhaps you will remember the circumstance. He was a depeply devout man from St Lucia working for a national accounting firm in Dallas . on his couch eating ice cream on a street that now named in his honor he was murdered by Dsllas Police Officer who claimed she mistakenly entered his apartment and mistook him for an intruder ...