Public Defender Mary Jo Earle

-

 

Conflict of interest

  • Refusal to Subpoena Witnesses and Conflict Suppression: Public defender Mary Jo Earle explicitly refused to subpoena the witnesses requested by Babak Taherzadeh—including the complaining witness Judge Birmingham, District Attorney Creuzot, and the District Clerk—under the stated rationale that she as counsel decided their testimony was not relevant, persuasive, or helpful. This refusal occurred despite Texas Ethics Commission campaign records showing that Earle had previously made a financial political contribution to Judge Brandon Birmingham’s judicial campaign on December 5, 2014, creating an undisclosed structural conflict of interest.

  • Denial of Removal: Richard Beacom (sitting without  assignment) formally denied Mary Jo Earle's motion to withdraw as attorney of record and refused any implied request for a hearing on the matter, locking Taherzadeh into representation by an attorney who refused to investigate or present his defense witnesses.




    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    "This Bench Belongs To The People" load of Crap is a Threat To Public Safty

    -
      Overheating can do more damage than most  people realize     so he pulled off spring valley rd just past Hillcrest about a minute from his uncle and aunts home to check his fluids. Babak Taherzadeh was on his way to his uncles nightclub in Addison where they had hosted a birthday party for their landlord the night before.  It was before 9 am on a Tuesday morning .   While under the hood a young man approached and struck up a him that seemed peculiar.    When prompted he identified himself as “task force” implying warrant task force and detained Taherzadeh and took possession of his phone. Three more Carrollton Detectives would arrive in Dalas and the process of “ inventoring” Taherzadehs vehicle and possessions began  while back at the sixth floor of the Dallas County Courthouse it was a hectic morning . Another   C arrollton detective would get Judge Jennifer Bennett    at 10:15 am to sign warrants with the alleged vict...
    Read more

    How The Texas Courts Assert Falsehoods And Suspend Fundamental Constitutional Privilege

    -
    Image
    The Dallas County District Clerk’s Clerk’s Record (CR), as forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, exposes a factual discrepancy pointing to a scheme: denying post-conviction relief pre-conviction while improperly suspending the determination of pre-conviction writs. The evidence of this transmission is documented in the   Clerks Record   across several key filings: The August 14 Filing:   The August 15, 2019 Amended Filing:   The Recusal:   The Assignment Claim: Judge Ray Wheless’s claim regarding the assignment of Judge Beacom. Wheless is a volume liar with differenrt standards for minority judges  Unassigned Actions: Beacom acted without authority. The False Claim: Beacom misrepresented the petition as being filed on an Article 11.07 post-conviction form when he lies that the "Applicant filed an 11.07 writ on the Court of Criminal Appeals prescribed form for post-conviction writs," which triggered the clerk's office to assign a post-con...
    Read more

    Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037)

    -
      Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037) I. Executive Summary: The Factual Plight of Cause No. F16-12037 A. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report provides a comprehensive, factual analysis of the procedural history of State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh , Cause No. F16-12037, based on a review of provided legal documents, including a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and various exhibits. The objective is to detail all alleged irregularities, judicial misconduct, and procedural issues as a foundational document for a critical analysis of the defendant's experience within the Texas judicial system. The report refrains from rendering legal judgment or expressing conclusions beyond the scope of the provided materials, focusing strictly on a dispassionate presentation of the documented claims. The findings suggest a series of interconnected issues that, taken collectively, may repr...
    Read more