The Institutional Collapse: A Triple Constitutional Crisis Before the CCA

-

 The Institutional Collapse: A Triple Constitutional Crisis Before the CCA

)

My ongoing legal struggle is no longer a mere criminal appeal; it is a test of institutional integrity. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) is now forced to confront a structural breakdown that began with a disqualified judge and was actively protected by the subsequent appellate courts. The very attempt to imprison me for my opinions on social media is the context forcing the CCA to address the gravest constitutional failures.

The underlying conviction suffers from a Triple Constitutional Crisis, stacking three independent, fatal violations on top of each other.

Violation 1: Structural Voidness (Disqualified Judge & Institutional Bias)

The foundation of the entire case is rotten. A judgment rendered by a judge with a personal interest in the outcome is fundamentally void.

1. The Violation: The judge who presided over the criminal trial was the alleged victim of the offense.

2. The Legal Result: This is a structural due process defect under the U.S. Constitution (Tumey v. Ohio). A judgment rendered by a constitutionally disqualified judge is void ab initio (legally nonexistent).

3. The COA's Failure: The Fifth Court of Appeals (COA) compounded this crisis by first denying mandamus relief (on September 24, 2025) and then denying the Motion for Rehearing En Banc (on October 8, 2025). By strictly enforcing procedural rules (like Rule 52), the COA defended a void judgment and protected the ministerial failure of Presiding Judge Ray Wheless to perform his mandatory duty under Rule 18a(f) to refer the initial recusal motion immediately.

Violation 2: Substantive Voidness (Ex Post Facto & Non-Crime)

The conviction was based on a law that did not exist at the time of the conduct, confirming the State lacked jurisdiction from the start.

1. The Violation: I was convicted for online comments made in 2016. At that time, the Texas Stalking Statute (\S 42.072) did not criminalize electronic communication, making the conviction an ex post facto application of law.

2. The Legal Result: Punishing conduct that was not criminal when it occurred violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and Due Process. This error is the same type of statutory misapplication the CCA addressed in Griswold v. State, proving the Fifth COA is repeating its own fundamental errors.

3. The Consequence: This void judgment was used to impose a sentence that included mandatory, unpaid prison labor, raising critical questions about the 13th Amendment (involuntary servitude for a non-crime).

Violation 3: The Threat to Free Speech (The 1st Amendment)

The underlying prosecution—an attempt to criminalize and imprison a citizen for protected, if provocative, speech on social media—is the reason this case must be heard.

1. The Violation: The entire proceeding originated from an attempt to criminalize and imprison a citizen for protected speech on Twitter. This constitutes a direct attack on the 1st Amendment and raises severe concerns about judicial overreach and the chilling effect on public criticism of the court system.

2. The Strategic Choice: My insistence on using social media as a public venue for justice is a direct counter-response to the State’s attempt to illegally silence me. The conviction, which resulted from a void judgment and a non-crime, was an act of censorship reinforced by the failure of the appellate courts to correct their own procedural and constitutional defects.

The Question Before the CCA

My Petition for Discretionary Review (PDR) appeals the Fifth COA’s October 8, 2025, denial of the Motion for Rehearing En Banc in Cause No. 05-25-01165-CR. This PDR presents the CCA with an inescapable choice:

Will the highest court in Texas allow procedural loopholes to shield a judgment that constitutes a total breakdown of constitutional government, voided by judicial bias, based on a non-existent crime, and used to illegally silence a citizen's speech?

The CCA must use its inherent power under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend all procedural hurdles and intervene in the interest of justice. The integrity of the state’s criminal justice system depends on it.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037)

-
  Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037) I. Executive Summary: The Factual Plight of Cause No. F16-12037 A. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report provides a comprehensive, factual analysis of the procedural history of State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh , Cause No. F16-12037, based on a review of provided legal documents, including a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and various exhibits. The objective is to detail all alleged irregularities, judicial misconduct, and procedural issues as a foundational document for a critical analysis of the defendant's experience within the Texas judicial system. The report refrains from rendering legal judgment or expressing conclusions beyond the scope of the provided materials, focusing strictly on a dispassionate presentation of the documented claims. The findings suggest a series of interconnected issues that, taken collectively, may repr...
Read more

⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being §§§§ By the Illustrious §§§§ Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of The United States of America

-
  ⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being There was a time when the law carried weight simply by being lawful — when a judge’s robe symbolized restraint, fairness, and humility before the Constitution. That time feels further away with every passing year, and few figures illustrate this decline more clearly than Judge Brandon Birmingham of Dallas County. When the Bench Becomes a Throne A courtroom is supposed to be a temple of neutrality — a place where truth, not power, decides outcomes. Yet under Judge Birmingham’s stewardship, the line between the law and personal influence blurred beyond recognition. Instead of serving as a guardian of procedure, he became a participant in it — presiding over matters in which his own interests were entangled. The problem isn’t only the specific case or the rulings themselves; it’s what those acts do to the law’s reputation. Every time a judge acts where he is disqualified, the robe stops bei...
Read more

"This Bench Belongs To The People" load of Crap is a Threat To Public Safty

-
  Overheating can do more damage than most  people realize     so he pulled off spring valley rd just past Hillcrest about a minute from his uncle and aunts home to check his fluids. Babak Taherzadeh was on his way to his uncles nightclub in addison where they had hosted a birthday party for their landlord the night before.  It was before 9 am on a Tuesday morning .   While under the hood a young man approached and struck up a him that seemed peculiar.    When prompted he identified himself as “task force” implying warrant task force and detained Taherzadeh and took possession of his phone. Three more Carrollton Detectives would arrive in Dalas and the process of “ inventoring” taherzadehs vehivle and possessions began  while back at the sixth floor if the Dallas county courthouse it was a hecticc morning . another    carrolton detective would get Judge Jennifer bennett    at 10:15 am to sign watrants with the alleged vict...
Read more