🔨 PUBLIC ULTIMATUM: THE CCA'S COVER-UP OF VOID JUDGMENT F16-12037

-

 🔨 PUBLIC ULTIMATUM: THE CCA'S COVER-UP OF VOID JUDGMENT F16-12037

TO THE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: YOUR COMPLICITY ENDS HERE.

This is not a blog post. This is a PUBLIC INDICTMENT and a direct warning. Your institutional survival depends on whether you possess the minimal integrity to correct the VOID JUDGMENT at the heart of Relator Babak Taherzadeh’s case (F16-12037).

Your continued evasion is not mere judicial error; it is a CRIMINAL ACT OF JUDICIAL COVER-UP protecting a colleague—Judge Brandon Birmingham—who committed a fundamental, unforgivable constitutional sin. The facts are on your docket. The law is clear. Your only move is to ACT, or face the brutal, targeted ridicule of exposure.

I. THE ROT AT THE CORE: BIRMINGHAM’S VOID JUDGMENT

The corruption that sent this Relator to prison is not a subtle mistake; it is a structural collapse that nullified the court's authority from the first moment.

• THE MONSTROUS CONFLICT: The Relator was accused of Felony Stalking via Twitter against then-Judge Brandon Birmingham. The case, F16-12037, was then criminally charged and assigned, in clear violation of Due Process, to the court of the alleged victim.

• THE LAW IS UNYIELDING: Longstanding constitutional doctrine (Tumey v. Ohio is foundational) prohibits adjudication by an interested judge. When the adjudicator has a direct, personal, and pecuniary interest in the outcome, the resulting judgment is not just reversible—it is VOID AB INITIO (void from the outset) . It carries no legal weight.

• THE CCA'S COWARDICE BEGINS: You are fully aware of this fact. If you fail to declare the F16-12037 judgment VOID—if you protect the original sin—you transform the entire Court of Criminal Appeals into the final, corrupt enabler of Judge Birmingham’s profound constitutional violation.

II. THE ARCHITECTURE OF EVASION: WHY YOUR EXCUSES ARE LIES

We anticipate your cowardly retreat. Your attempts to shield this injustice behind technicality will be exposed and ridiculed as deliberate institutional fraud:

1. THE "PROCEDURAL DEFAULT" SHAM: YOUR CLERICAL FRAUD 📜

You will claim that because the Relator or his prior counsel, often hampered by the very system designed to silence them, failed to raise the VOID JUDGMENT argument at the perfect moment, the claim is forfeited.

• THE INDICTMENT: A void judgment cannot be legalized by poor paperwork. A judge’s lack of jurisdiction is not cured by a defendant’s legal mistake. If you use procedural default here, you are publicly declaring that you value clerical neatness more than the integrity of the Texas Constitution. This makes you a STENOGRAPHER FOR CORRUPTION.

2. THE "HARMLESS ERROR" ABOMINATION: THE LIE OF COMPLACENCY 🤮

You may acknowledge the conflict of interest but claim it was a "harmless error" that did not affect the outcome of the trial.

• THE RIDICULE: To argue that a trial presided over by the alleged victim of the crime is "harmless" is to commit intellectual treason. It implies that Due Process is a decorative suggestion, not a constitutional mandate. We will publish a direct comparison of this ruling to the most egregious failures of justice, demonstrating that the CCA views the right to an impartial judge as merely a minor technicality that doesn't "count" when a colleague is protected.

3. THE DISQUALIFICATION DODGE: RAY WHELESS’S FAILURE 🔪

The corruption cascaded when Presiding Judge Ray Wheless failed to follow the mandatory three-day rule (Rule 18a(f)) to sign and refer the motion to disqualify.

• THE WARNING: This failure—to follow a clear, ministerial, non-discretionary rule—is another act of institutional obstruction designed to slow-walk the truth and silence the Relator. If you fail to condemn Wheless's refusal to perform a mandatory duty, you are condoning the systematic exclusion of the Relator from due process.

III. THE FINAL WARNING: CHOOSE JUSTICE OR CHOOSE INFAMY

The CCA’s job is not to protect the system’s judges; it is to protect the system’s integrity. By refusing to confront the VOID nature of the judgment, you are choosing to endorse the original act of judicial corruption.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED:

Your ruling will not be analyzed for its legal brilliance, but for its moral cowardice. Every judge who participates in this evasion will be named and shamed for their Complicity in Preserving a Void and Corrupt Judgment.

FIX IT. DECLARE IT VOID. OR BE EXPOSED


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037)

-
  Report on Alleged Irregularities, Judicial Misconduct, and Procedural Issues in State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh (Cause No. F16-12037) I. Executive Summary: The Factual Plight of Cause No. F16-12037 A. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report provides a comprehensive, factual analysis of the procedural history of State of Texas v. Babak Taherzadeh , Cause No. F16-12037, based on a review of provided legal documents, including a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and various exhibits. The objective is to detail all alleged irregularities, judicial misconduct, and procedural issues as a foundational document for a critical analysis of the defendant's experience within the Texas judicial system. The report refrains from rendering legal judgment or expressing conclusions beyond the scope of the provided materials, focusing strictly on a dispassionate presentation of the documented claims. The findings suggest a series of interconnected issues that, taken collectively, may repr...
Read more

⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being §§§§ By the Illustrious §§§§ Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of The United States of America

-
  ⚖️ The Diminishing Prestige of the Law — and Why It Matters to Every Human Being There was a time when the law carried weight simply by being lawful — when a judge’s robe symbolized restraint, fairness, and humility before the Constitution. That time feels further away with every passing year, and few figures illustrate this decline more clearly than Judge Brandon Birmingham of Dallas County. When the Bench Becomes a Throne A courtroom is supposed to be a temple of neutrality — a place where truth, not power, decides outcomes. Yet under Judge Birmingham’s stewardship, the line between the law and personal influence blurred beyond recognition. Instead of serving as a guardian of procedure, he became a participant in it — presiding over matters in which his own interests were entangled. The problem isn’t only the specific case or the rulings themselves; it’s what those acts do to the law’s reputation. Every time a judge acts where he is disqualified, the robe stops bei...
Read more

"This Bench Belongs To The People" load of Crap is a Threat To Public Safty

-
  Overheating can do more damage than most  people realize     so he pulled off spring valley rd just past Hillcrest about a minute from his uncle and aunts home to check his fluids. Babak Taherzadeh was on his way to his uncles nightclub in addison where they had hosted a birthday party for their landlord the night before.  It was before 9 am on a Tuesday morning .   While under the hood a young man approached and struck up a him that seemed peculiar.    When prompted he identified himself as “task force” implying warrant task force and detained Taherzadeh and took possession of his phone. Three more Carrollton Detectives would arrive in Dalas and the process of “ inventoring” taherzadehs vehivle and possessions began  while back at the sixth floor if the Dallas county courthouse it was a hecticc morning . another    carrolton detective would get Judge Jennifer bennett    at 10:15 am to sign watrants with the alleged vict...
Read more